Beijing vs. China

by Chinfographics on May 24, 2010

Just updated. We made a lil’ error. See comments. Thanks for all your support!

Beijing vs. China

Beijing is approximately 1% of China's Population

It’s true. Beijing’s urban area population relative to the country’s total is very small. The capital had an urban area population of 12.4 million in 2007, 0.94% of the country’s 1.32 billion. Dalian, a sea-port city in northeast China is at the right side of Beijing in the graph, with a population of 3.2 million. And the smallest dot is Qiqihar, far deeply located in the northeast part, with 1 million people.

Before you go ahead saying that Beijing has 17M or even 22M inhabitants we just want to note that we have used statistics from 2007 and it is ONLY the Urban Area Population which means “a continuously built up landmass of urban development”, or “the lighted area that can be observed from an airplane at night”. We believe that is a fair measure and it relates to the statistics of our overall infographic – The Long Tail – of 60 Chinese cities above 1M citizen

Beijing vs. China - close-up

Close-up of the Beijing vs. China infographic.

Definition of Urban Area Population: “the lighted area that can be observed from an airplane at night”
Source: Demographia.com

Coming Next: 3rd & last post in our population series; Chinese and Western cities mapped and mixed

Embed the full image with this code:

<a href="http://chinfographics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Beijing-vs-china-infographics_fullsize.gif"><img title="Beijing-vs-china-infographics_fullsize" src="http://chinfographics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Beijing-vs-china-infographics_fullsize.gif" alt="Beijing vs. China" width="569" height="660" /></a>

21 Tweets 2 Other Comments

{ 17 comments… read them below or add one }

nexusil May 25, 2010 at 22:49

Mis-visualizing China

How can that possibly be 1%? Are you using 1% of radius instead of 1% of area? That would be an extreme misrepresentation showing Beijing as only 0.01% of China by population.

P.S. It’ll be even more dramatic if you use spheres if that’s the name of the game

chinfo May 25, 2010 at 23:16

You are of course right. Circle was made with Illustrator adding 100% when changing shape. Bad double-check. Anyone can see it. we’ll go back to our own math, change and improve. Thanks for commenting

nexusil May 25, 2010 at 23:32

Appreciate your work, the 60 cities have a similar problem, but a lot less obvious. I don’t mind though since it makes my home city look bigger and who cares about Qiqihar =)

chinfo May 26, 2010 at 22:59

As Chris, Nexusil and some others have pointed out we relied heavily on Illustrator % scaling of a Shape and not our own math skills. Post is now updated with the correct representation of shapes. We’ll improve!

Alex May 31, 2010 at 03:54

Nice. I really do like your visualisations. And your “used statistics from 2007 and it is ONLY the Urban Area Population” has just answered my last question.

Leave a Comment

Connect with Facebook

{ 4 trackbacks }

Additional comments powered by BackType

Previous post:

Next post: